What Should We Call “Erdogan”?
What Should We Call “Erdogan”?
Turkey’s presidential elections ended with Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s retaining his crown of kingdom with winning with only low margin of 52% of votes and it was expected him to choose Iran as his first destination for visit after his re-election but the dream of Turkestan (Turk Land) drove him to a wrong destination Baku and his remarks in Baku was a mistake worse than his visit.

TEHRAN (Iran News) –Turkey’s presidential elections ended with Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s retaining his crown of kingdom with winning with only low margin of 52% of votes and it was expected him to choose Iran as his first destination for visit after his re-election but the dream of Turkestan (Turk Land) drove him to a wrong destination Baku and his remarks in Baku was a mistake worse than his visit.

Action for adopting foreign policy in the field of neighborhood after any election is very strategic and in fact it brands its signs on the forehead of the executor and it will be never cleaned up. Islamic nations today need maturity among their leaders to provide the ground for civilizing but unpleasant sound and awkward behavior creates a lasting scar on the body of the revived Islamic civilization and its healing takes long time.

The least expectation was that Erdogan to make most of new correlation between Tehran and Riyadh and to join this effective unity. He definitely knows that a new chapter in Islamic relations has been opened in the region or better to say in the world which can be reviewed based on the détente. Action for détente will not be definitely in the benefit of Muslim nations in the region because we all witnessed immediately after revelation of the détente process in the Persian Gulf, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that some disaster has happened which has ruined all calculations of Israel in the region.

Erdogan with his remarks please and hearten Netanyahu. This behavior happens in a condition that Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister visits Tehran for re-opening embassy along with officially endorsing the détente-centered foreign policy.

This visit happened while three world military powers, Biden’s U.S., Putin’s Russia and Xi’s China, are at the climax of creating tension. Ukraine’s wound is getting worse day in day and this clearly shows that with publishing of any news regarding revival of strategic and civilizing relations, the Zionist regime trembles with fear from inside.

Now Mr. Erdogan is craving for creating rift and with his visit to Baku is fanning the flame of war in Karabakh, and Azerbaijan is also unaware of Turkey’s ill intention of a united Turkestan (Turk land) and is not aware of Erdogan’s plot as he considers Azerbaijan as one of his provinces. In the current bad economic condition of Turkey, such an act can be attributed to a drunkard than a sober for taking a correct and strategic action in line with Turkish people’s interests.

Erdogan should have understood that normalization of ties between Tehran and Riyadh would be a deadly blow to the existence of the Zionist regime which still continues occupation of Palestinians’ lands and their massacre. If Erdogan had just a little history knowledge, he would know that Iran has been and will be, too, the homeland of Azeris for generations through the centuries. From his inexperienced and transient remarks and leader of Baku nothing but dirty blur will remain in the minds of nations of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Iran and definitely in the future relations, it will be taken into consideration.

According to the released statistics, Iranians have invested tens of billions of dollars in Turkey and this has happened because of negligence of governments in the Islamic Revolution and with a small reaction by Iran’s Majlis, it can find the opposite direction. Recent earthquake in Turkey seems to be forgotten as Erdogan has unnoticed Iran’s humanitarian aids. This way, we do not know what to call Erdogan. Rebel? Forgetful? Fame Seeker? Or colleague of Netanyahu? That each one of those names can interpret and express some parts of Erdogan’s behavior.

The leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran seriously do not seek any tension in the West Asia and all evidences show that when in this condition the U.S. has accepted the Islamic Republic of Iran’s demands  and raised the issue of releasing the frozen funds of Iran and seeking mending ties out of the JCPOA and uses the rhetoric of necessity of diplomacy, it has, undoubtedly taken into consideration the regional power of the Islamic Republic’s growing diplomacy in the region and moving in the opposite direction of the U.S. will be a deadly poison for Erdogan.