TEHRAN (Iran News) Speaking to IRNA on Tuesday, Mehrdad Ali-Qardashi pointed to Iran’s ranking in the coaching by the International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF), saying that with a total of 1,105 coaches, the country could manage to achieve the first place in the world.

He said that Iran currently has 1,001 active coaches at level-one, 86 coaches at level-two, and 18 coaches at level-three, whose details are available on the website of the ITTF.

Iran’s exact share of the world’s total registered coaches is calculated as 15.36 percent, meaning that approximately every 6 to 7 international coaches registered on this list is an Iranian coach.

According to him, Egypt and India are in the second and third places in the world’s table tennis coaching after Iran, contrary to a popular belief that China, Japan, and South Korea are among the top three.

Ali-Qardashi attributed the Iran’s ranking to the improved scientific level of coaches, which resulted in Iranian teenagers and young adults to defeat the Paris Olympic title-holders.

He reminded the words of the ITTF chief, a member of the International Olympic Committee and himself a world champion from Sweden, who during the meeting with the Secretary General of the National Olympic Committee praised Benyamin Faraji for defeating World and Olympics champion and world No. 1 Wang Chuqin at the 2024 Asian Table Tennis Championships.

The head of Iran’s Table Tennis Federation underscored that such praises for a teenager from West Asia, who defeated the first and second world players from China, shows the importance of Iranian coaches.

The post Iran tops in registered international table tennis coaches: Official appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Viewing governance strictly through three branches, conventionalizing the coercive power, failing to regard culture as an integrated power in itself, decentralizing education outside a unified power-based structure, and adopting a livelihood-centered and state-centered approach to the economy have all contributed to state-centric movements. Every few years, these movements have been directed along partisan and factional lines.

Of course, the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a synthesis of a monotheistic ontology (God-centered) and a people-based methodology symbolized by republicanism. For this reason, one can observe a certain alignment—within both the written and unwritten lines of the text—with Western liberalism (which is founded upon humanism and anthropocentrism).

Thus, in some principles and concepts, similarities and overlaps with the values of Western liberal democracy can be observed. These commonalities appear mainly in the realm of “methods” and “citizens’ rights.” Entrusting cultural development entirely to the government without consistent supervision over its content and direction, or assigning education to the executive branch without aligning it with the necessities of the Revolution and national governance, as well as adopting a partisan and ideologically tinted approach to the economy—alongside pure capitalism without a focus on justice—have over the years led to the politicization of culture along factional lines, fragmentation of non-aligned educational content, and the emergence of a wealthy elite class immersed in affluence. This economic model has consistently created challenges across all sectors.

We remain committed to principles within this Constitution; yet instead of giving primacy to these principles in overarching content and expecting governments to pave the way for substantive implementation, we have made the executive administrator the very foundation of content itself.

Let us consider the following principles:

A – Popular Sovereignty and Republicanism

(Similar to Democracy)

Western liberalism emphasizes popular sovereignty and the social contract. In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, this concept is embodied in the republican nature of the system:

Article 6:

“In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the affairs of the country must be administered by reliance on public opinion, through elections: the election of the President, representatives of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, members of councils, and the like.”

Article 56:

“Absolute sovereignty over the world and humanity belongs to God, and it is He who has made man master of his own social destiny. No one can deprive man of this divine right…”

Although these principles are defined within a religious framework, in terms of their popular character and recourse to public opinion, they correspond with the democratic mechanisms of Western liberalism.

B – Fundamental Freedoms

(Similar to Liberalism)

Freedom is the core of liberalism. In Chapter Three (Rights of the Nation), the Constitution refers to a wide range of freedoms similar to those set forth in international charters (influenced by liberalism):

Article 23:

The investigation of beliefs is forbidden, and “no one may be molested or taken to task simply for holding a certain belief.”

Article 24:

Freedom of the press is guaranteed, “unless it is detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam or the rights of the public.”

Article 27:

Freedom of assembly and marches is permitted, “provided that arms are not carried and that they are not detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam.”

Article 22:

The dignity, life, property, rights, residence, and occupation of individuals are inviolable.

C – Human Rights and Human Dignity

(Shared Concepts)

Research indicates that in certain respects, the Constitution aligns with human rights positions (which have roots in liberalism):

Articles 19–21:

Equality of individuals before the law, observance of women’s rights, and protection of mothers.

Article 32:

The right to legal recourse and judicial security (arrests must be made according to law).

Article 38:

Torture for the purpose of extracting confessions is forbidden.

These principles display relative harmony with the liberal view of inherent human rights (regardless of gender, race, or religion).

D – Rejection of Domination and Independence

(Similar to Anti-Colonial Principles)

Interestingly, some principles of foreign policy in the Constitution (such as Articles 152 and 154) bear semantic resemblance to the outlook of early Iranian liberals during the Constitutional era, who sought to reject foreign domination and preserve independence. Although these principles are rooted in the Islamic concept of rejecting subjugation, in terms of “independence and freedom from foreign powers,” they share common ground with nationalist liberal ideals.

A General View

In an overall assessment, the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran shares similarities with liberalism in its instrumental and procedural aspects:

The use of voting and elections

Recognition of conditional freedoms

Respect for citizens’ rights

However, at the level of foundations, the difference is fundamental. In Western liberalism, human autonomy is the source of rights, whereas in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, divine authority forms the basis of action, and people’s rights are defined within the framework of Islamic criteria (Article 4).

In other words, in liberalism, freedom is unlimited unless it harms another person; but in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, freedom is limited by adherence to Islamic principles under the authority and supervision of a qualified Islamic jurist.

The post A Look at the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Mahmoud Siadat, head of the Iran–Afghanistan Joint Chamber of Commerce, said that official recognition of the Taliban government—referred to by its authorities as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan—would significantly strengthen commercial relations and provide greater confidence for long-term investments and private-sector engagement.

His remarks followed recent statements by Alireza Bigdeli, Iran’s ambassador in Kabul, who indicated that Tehran may soon formally recognize the Taliban-led administration.

In an interview, Siadat said there is no certainty yet regarding recognition, but noted that Iran’s relations with Afghanistan’s current authorities have steadily improved across multiple sectors.

“Fortunately, relations between Iran and the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan are improving day by day in various fields,” he said.

According to Siadat, official recognition by Tehran would create greater stability and reassurance for private-sector actors seeking to engage in Afghanistan. This would be particularly important for long-term projects such as railway connectivity linking Iran to China through Afghan territory, as well as major public and private investment initiatives.

“When it comes to long-term contracts and strategic infrastructure projects, recognition would make it easier to rely on agreements and move forward with confidence,” he said.

Siadat described current economic relations between the two countries as strong and friendly, but emphasized that formal diplomatic recognition would further enhance both the perception and practical realities of cooperation.

Citing Iranian customs data, he said Iran’s annual exports to Afghanistan exceed $2.5 billion. However, Afghan customs authorities report even higher figures, estimating imports from Iran at more than $3 billion per year.

In total, Siadat estimated that Iran’s combined exports of goods and services to Afghanistan amount to approximately $3.5 billion annually.

By contrast, Afghanistan’s exports to Iran remain limited, totaling around $100 million per year.

A significant portion of Iran’s exports to Afghanistan consists of technical and engineering services, which Siadat said exceed $500 million annually. However, he acknowledged that there is no comprehensive database tracking these activities.

He attributed the lack of accurate data to insufficient government support and incentives. In the past, Iran’s Trade Promotion Organization provided bonuses of up to five percent of contract values to exporters of technical and engineering services, encouraging companies to formally register their overseas activities.

“Today, not only are there no incentives, but exporters are concerned about potential penalties, taxes, and social security obligations,” Siadat said. “As a result, many prefer not to register their activities.”

He added that Afghanistan’s most pressing needs go beyond goods and include technical services, consultancy, knowledge transfer, and technology—areas in which Iran has considerable capacity but has underperformed in terms of policy support.

Looking ahead, Siadat highlighted agriculture as a key area for expanding bilateral cooperation. He said Iran has already imported cotton, legumes, and certain agricultural products from Afghanistan this year, along with limited quantities of zinc ore, lead, and other minerals.

However, industrial and mining imports from Afghanistan currently face logistical and structural challenges. As a result, Iranian policymakers and business leaders are increasingly turning their attention to agricultural cooperation.

“We are seeking to implement contract farming in Afghanistan,” Siadat said. “Given that more than 50 percent of Afghanistan’s economy and workforce is engaged in agriculture, livestock, fisheries, and horticulture, this sector offers significant potential.”

Under contract farming arrangements, Iranian companies would invest in Afghan agricultural production, providing technology, expertise, and guaranteed purchase agreements. The harvested products—such as legumes, meat, and other agricultural goods—would then be exported to Iran.

Siadat suggested that such cooperation could reduce Iran’s dependence on more distant suppliers.

“Instead of importing legumes from Canada, we can source them from Afghanistan,” he said. “Through contract farming and the transfer of knowledge and technology, we can import agricultural products and meat from Afghanistan in a structured and mutually beneficial way.”

Siadat also noted that remittances sent by Afghan nationals residing in Iran likely exceed the value of Iran’s total exports to Afghanistan. Millions of Afghans live and work in Iran, sending portions of their earnings back home to support their families.

This flow of funds, he said, underscores the deep economic interdependence between the two neighbors.

While formal recognition of the Taliban government by Iran has not yet been confirmed, Siadat made clear that such a move would mark a turning point in economic relations. It would not only solidify existing trade flows but also pave the way for expanded infrastructure projects, agricultural investment, and long-term strategic cooperation.

For now, trade between the two countries remains robust despite the absence of formal recognition. But business leaders argue that a clearer diplomatic framework could unlock further growth—particularly in sectors such as rail connectivity, agriculture, engineering services, and cross-border investment.

As discussions continue, Iran appears poised to deepen its economic engagement with Afghanistan, with contract farming emerging as a central pillar of its evolving strategy.

The post Iran Eyes Contract Farming in Afghanistan appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Speaking on Monday at a high-level segment of the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, Gharibabadi outlined the principled positions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran and called for a renewed international commitment to effective multilateralism, genuine disarmament, and unconditional respect for international law.

In his address, Gharibabadi described the current international security climate as “complex and deeply concerning.” He pointed to the persistence of armed conflicts, ongoing occupations, and what he characterized as crimes committed in the West Asia region by the Government of Israel as among the most pressing threats to global peace and security.

He further warned that the erosion of the foundational principles of the United Nations Charter has compounded instability worldwide. According to the Iranian diplomat, the weakening of multilateralism and the expansion of unilateral approaches have revived a dangerous cycle of arms races, particularly in the nuclear domain.

“The continued reliance by certain states on nuclear weapons in their security doctrines stands in clear contradiction to their international obligations,” Gharibabadi said. “Such policies undermine both the moral and legal foundations of the global non-proliferation regime.”

Reiterating Iran’s longstanding position, Gharibabadi described nuclear weapons as the gravest threat to humanity and human civilization. He urged all nuclear-armed states to commit immediately to the complete, irreversible, and verifiable destruction of their nuclear arsenals.

He stressed that meaningful progress in non-proliferation can only be achieved through balanced, reciprocal, and legally binding commitments. In particular, he called on nuclear-weapon states to fulfill their obligations under Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which requires signatories to pursue negotiations in good faith toward nuclear disarmament.

Gharibabadi also advocated for the commencement of negotiations on a comprehensive nuclear weapons convention that would provide binding security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon states.

In addition to nuclear disarmament, the Iranian official warned against the increasing militarization of outer space. He criticized attempts by certain countries to define space as a domain for military confrontation, calling such efforts a threat to the shared heritage of humanity.

“Outer space must be preserved exclusively for peaceful purposes,” he said, urging the international community to prevent its weaponization and ensure that space remains a domain for cooperation rather than conflict.

Gharibabadi described the NPT as the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation and disarmament architecture. He asserted that Iran has consistently honored its obligations under the treaty.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran has always remained committed to its obligations under the NPT,” he stated. “Our right to benefit from peaceful nuclear energy is inherent, non-negotiable, and guaranteed within the framework of international law.”

He underscored that this right cannot be made conditional in negotiations nor subject to suspension or deprivation. According to Gharibabadi, peaceful nuclear technology is essential for Iran’s development and energy security.

The deputy foreign minister categorically rejected allegations that Iran’s nuclear program has military objectives. “The Islamic Republic of Iran neither possesses nuclear weapons, nor has it sought to acquire them, nor does it have any intention of doing so,” he said.

He emphasized that Iran’s nuclear program is entirely peaceful and guided not only by its legal commitments but also by its religious and ethical principles, which reject weapons of mass destruction.

Gharibabadi criticized what he described as double standards in the implementation of disarmament commitments, arguing that selective enforcement undermines trust and weakens the global non-proliferation regime.

Referring to recent diplomatic developments in Geneva, Gharibabadi suggested that a new opportunity has emerged for resolving disputes through dialogue.

“Any sustainable negotiation must be based on mutual respect, equal treatment, and the non-selective implementation of international rules,” he said.

At the same time, he reaffirmed Iran’s readiness to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. “While we have chosen the path of diplomacy, the Islamic Republic of Iran remains fully prepared to defend its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and its people,” he stated, adding that Iran would exercise its inherent right to self-defense under the UN Charter if necessary.

Gharibabadi also reiterated Iran’s long-standing initiative to establish a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. He argued that achieving this objective requires universal adherence to the NPT and the placement of all nuclear facilities in the region under comprehensive safeguards.

He identified Israel’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction and what he described as repeated nuclear threats as major obstacles to realizing such a zone.

Concluding his remarks, Gharibabadi stressed that sustainable peace cannot be achieved through pressure or threats, but rather through dialogue, mutual respect, the rule of law, and genuine multilateralism.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran stands ready to cooperate with states to strengthen the international disarmament architecture and move toward a world free of nuclear weapons,” he declared.

His speech at the Conference on Disarmament signals Tehran’s continued effort to frame its nuclear activities within the bounds of international law while pressing nuclear-armed states to meet their disarmament obligations. As diplomatic efforts continue in Geneva, Iran has made clear that while it is open to dialogue, its claim to peaceful nuclear energy remains, in its view, beyond negotiation.

The post Iran Declares Peaceful Nuclear Energy an “Inalienable and Non-Negotiable Right” appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Speaking during his weekly press briefing, Baghaei addressed the proposed Iranian text for the next round of nuclear talks and the possibility of reaching a temporary agreement. He said speculation surrounding negotiations is not unusual but cannot be confirmed, stressing that the technical details of any negotiation process are discussed inside the negotiation room. He added that a temporary agreement has no formal basis, noting that drafting negotiation texts is a joint process between the parties involved.

The spokesman reiterated that Iran is working to formulate its own views regarding the termination of what it describes as unjust sanctions and nuclear-related issues. He also said that Iran is well aware of the United States’ position, emphasizing that any negotiation must be a cooperative effort rather than one-sided pressure. Baghaei stressed that Iran remains committed to the diplomatic path because it believes in the legitimacy of its stance. He stated that Iran will continue negotiations as long as there is confidence that the process will lead to tangible results.

Regarding statements made by Rafael Grossi about inspections of nuclear facilities by the International Atomic Energy Agency, Baghaei said Iran has no preconditions for IAEA visits. However, he distinguished between general cooperation with the agency and inspections of damaged facilities, explaining that there is currently no established inspection method for such sites.

Baghaei also commented on reports concerning a possible visit by Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, to Oman, stating that the report must be verified and that he has no confirmed information about the trip.

In response to the designation of European military forces as “terrorist” organizations by the European Union, Baghaei said Iran’s stance was based on a resolution passed by the Iranian parliament. He argued that the EU decision violated fundamental principles of international law and that labeling official military forces of a sovereign state is unacceptable. He added that European forces operating in the region would now be viewed differently, warning that the designation may have practical consequences.

Baghaei also discussed Iran’s proposal presented during a nuclear disarmament meeting in Geneva, noting that the initiative has been discussed for decades and aims to promote global nuclear disarmament in line with the goals of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. He said nuclear-armed states have continued to expand and modernize their arsenals, arguing that public demands for implementation of non-proliferation commitments are growing.

Addressing questions about Iran’s confidence in resisting U.S. pressure, Baghaei said Iran’s confidence comes from its history, culture, and perception of its rightful position. He rejected the concept of “surrender” in Iran’s diplomatic approach, stating that Iranian society has historically resisted submission. From the perspective of international law, he said, the notion of forcing surrender contradicts global legal norms since all countries are equal members of the United Nations and international relations must respect state sovereignty.

Responding to claims about institutional disagreements between Iran’s foreign ministry and other national security bodies regarding negotiations, Baghaei said nuclear policy is implemented based on decisions made by the Supreme National Security Council, where all relevant institutions participate and express their views before final decisions are taken.

Regarding the potential adoption of the Additional Protocol, he said Iran previously implemented it voluntarily during the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action period. He added that any future voluntary commitment would depend on reciprocal steps related to sanctions relief. He described the protocol as a confidence-building instrument demonstrating the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program.

Rejecting allegations that Iran is intentionally prolonging negotiations, Baghaei said the claim has no basis. He emphasized that Iran is willing to continue talks without interruption if necessary, noting that negotiations held every ten days are not ideal. He stated that diplomatic talks are only useful if they lead to concrete outcomes and argued that rational policy requires accelerating efforts to lift sanctions.

On relations with the Taliban authorities, Baghaei said Iran’s relations with Afghanistan are based on mutual respect and shared cultural and religious ties. He highlighted common concerns such as security, narcotics trafficking, and water resource management. He added that discussions regarding official recognition of the Taliban are political and sovereign matters that will be announced when a final decision is reached.

Baghaei also responded to statements by Israeli officials regarding alleged plans to confront the so-called “Shiite axis.” Using a Persian proverb meaning “a camel dreams of seeing sesame seeds,” he dismissed such claims. He stated that there is no distinction between Shiite, Sunni, Arab, or non-Arab populations in the policy of Israel. He further claimed that Israeli leaders have repeatedly expressed ambitions for regional dominance, including references to territorial expansion ideas.

He warned that such rhetoric increases regional concerns about Israel’s intentions, urging countries in the region to cooperate more closely against what he described as dangerous strategic illusions before it becomes too late.

Baghaei also commented on statements suggesting that a better agreement than the 2015 nuclear deal is achievable. He said the primary duty of Iranian diplomacy is to secure the rights of the Iranian nation, emphasizing that any acceptable agreement must guarantee Iran’s nuclear and economic rights, including sanctions relief. He stated that building trust is possible if other parties seriously accept that Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful, noting that no diversion toward weaponization has been observed.

Regarding U.S. sanctions, Baghaei said the purpose of sanctions has become increasingly explicit, arguing that Washington aims to create pressure on Iranian citizens in hopes of generating public unrest against the government.

Addressing reports about the escape of militants from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria into Iraq, Baghaei said Iran remains concerned about any development that could encourage the expansion of terrorism in the region. He recalled the heavy costs paid by Iran, Iraq, and Syria in combating the extremist group and stressed that Iran has communicated its concerns to Iraqi authorities.

Concluding his remarks, the spokesman said Iran’s foreign policy focuses on protecting national interests while continuing diplomatic engagement. He reiterated that Tehran aims to avoid being distracted by secondary issues and will pursue negotiations that produce meaningful results.

The post Iran Does Not Benefit from Prolonged Negotiations appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) The Special Committee on the Charter of the United Nations and on the Strengthening of the Role of the Organization is a specialized and permanent body within the framework of the United Nations.

Regarding its history, the Committee was established in 1974—five years before the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran—by the United Nations General Assembly.

Its formation stemmed from two separate initiatives in the late 1960s: one proposal by Colombia to review the Charter, and another by Romania to strengthen the role of the United Nations. These two tracks ultimately led to the creation of an Ad Hoc Committee, which in 1975 was transformed into the present Special Committee.

The Committee’s primary mission is to carefully examine proposals by Member States aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the commitments and decisions of the United Nations. However, such reviews must always take place within the framework of the United Nations Charter. In other words, the Committee seeks ways to better implement the provisions of the Charter and strengthen the Organization’s role in key areas.

Its responsibilities include:

Reviewing proposals and views of countries concerning the United Nations Charter.

Examining ways to strengthen the UN’s role in maintaining international peace and security, developing cooperation among nations, and promoting the rules of international law.

Compiling a list of proposals submitted and identifying those that enjoy broader support.

As the only permanent committee dedicated specifically to Charter-related matters, it holds special importance. Among the most significant issues on its agenda are:

Maintaining international peace and security: examining various aspects to strengthen the UN’s role.

Promoting methods such as negotiation, mediation, and international arbitration.

Reviewing the effects of Security Council sanctions on third countries and exploring ways to assist them.

Updating the Organization’s records and supervising the preparation and revision of two important sources: Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs and Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council, which function as the institutional memory of the Organization.

According to official UN reports, the Islamic Republic of Iran has consistently maintained an active presence in this Committee. Iran has not only participated as a member but has often represented the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), articulating the views of this large group of countries. For example, during the 71st (2016) and 72nd (2017) sessions of the General Assembly, Iran’s representative was identified as the spokesperson of the Non-Aligned Movement. This selection reflects other Member States’ trust in Iran’s legal diplomacy.

Now, Iran’s election as Vice-Chair and member of the Bureau indicates that at the Committee’s most recent session in New York, the Islamic Republic of Iran was chosen for these leadership roles. Such appointments within UN diplomacy carry significant weight and signify a more influential role for Iran in guiding the Committee’s agenda, facilitating negotiations, and setting priorities.

At the same time, this achievement demonstrates the country’s high level of expertise and diplomatic capacity in the field of international law, as recognized by other nations. Membership in the Bureau provides Iran with an opportunity to more effectively defend its interests and those of like-minded countries regarding key issues such as UN structural reform, the clarification of states’ lawlessness—particularly the United States’ use of sanctions—and peaceful settlement of disputes.

In committees such as the Special Committee on the Charter, members of the Bureau (including the Chair, Vice-Chairs, and Rapporteur) are generally elected by consensus, following informal consultations among regional groups. In other words, there is no formal recorded vote in which one can identify which countries voted “yes” for Iran.

Iran’s election therefore indicates that during consultations, there was no opposition from Member States. Moreover, under current circumstances—when the Trump administration seeks to further discredit the United Nations—this selection was accompanied by implicit approval and collective support of nations, reflecting the political significance and the underlying views of countries regarding Iran.

It should be acknowledged, however, that the primary reason for this collective agreement also lies in Iran’s active and constructive role within the Committee. Iran has a longstanding record of representing the Non-Aligned Movement as its spokesperson in Committee sessions. This diplomatic and legal capability has earned the confidence of other countries and convinced them that Iran can effectively contribute to guiding the Committee’s agenda.

Bureau positions in such committees are typically held for a one-year term, corresponding to the working year of the General Assembly, which begins each September. These terms are renewable, subject to consensus and agreement at the Committee’s subsequent annual meeting. Therefore, for Iran to retain this position next year, it must once again receive Member States’ approval.

The Impact of the Special Committee on the Charter

The Special Committee plays a subtle, specialized, and foundational role within the UN system. Its influence can be analyzed in several key areas:

1. A Platform for Safeguarding the Rule of Law

The Committee’s most important function is providing a specialized forum for interpreting and implementing the United Nations Charter accurately. At a time when the international order faces serious challenges, this Committee serves as a legal platform where fundamental principles—such as sovereign equality of states, prohibition of the use of force, and peaceful settlement of disputes—are supported and examined by experts.

In other words, by promoting these principles, the Committee contributes to strengthening the rule of law and preserving the credibility of the international legal system.

2. A Forum for Reviewing and Proposing Reforms

The Committee’s main mission is to review Member States’ proposals aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the United Nations within the framework of the Charter. This means that any idea for reforming UN structures or working methods undergoes preliminary legal examination in this Committee before further action.

Recently, António Guterres has issued warnings regarding the efficiency of the United Nations. Reform—particularly of the Security Council—remains a recurring and pressing issue in international forums. Although final decisions rest with the General Assembly and the Security Council, much of the preparatory and technical work is carried out in committees such as the Special Committee on the Charter. The Secretary-General has repeatedly emphasized the need for reforms to enhance efficiency, and this Committee is where that necessity is translated into legal language.

3. Institutional Memory of the United Nations

One of the Committee’s vital yet less visible responsibilities is overseeing the preparation and updating of two key documents:

Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs

Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council

These documents serve as the institutional memory of the United Nations, recording precedents in interpreting and applying Charter provisions. They are considered essential and authoritative resources for diplomats, legal scholars, and international judges at the International Court of Justice.

4. An Opportunity for Developing Countries

For countries such as Iran, this Committee provides an important platform to articulate their perspectives—and those of like-minded countries such as the Non-Aligned Movement—on fundamental issues of international law. Participation in the Bureau enables the Islamic Republic of Iran to play a more active role in steering these specialized discussions and to defend principles emphasized in the Charter, such as sovereign equality and non-intervention in domestic affairs, against emerging challenges.

In short, the Committee’s impact may be compared to that of a fundamental jurisprudential or constitutional council within a system. Its decisions may not be directly operational, but it establishes the framework and interpretations that other organs and states consider themselves bound to respect.

The post Iran: Guardian of the United Nations Charter appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Speaking during a ceremony on Saturday, Pezeshkian pointed to the difficult conditions facing the country and underscored the government’s determination to overcome them.

“We will strive for Iran to the very last drop of our blood. Despite all the shortages, problems, pressures, and injustices, the government, by God’s grace and relying on the unity and cohesion of society, will endeavor to overcome these hardships and will not allow any obstacle to remain in the path of the nation’s dignity,” he stated.

The president continued, “We will not bow in surrender to difficulties. Despite all the troubles and pressures, even if certain powers stand against the Iranian nation with unfair conduct, our resolve to stand firm and advance will not weaken.”

Pezeshkian added, “Even if the world and powerful states stand against us to force us to bow before them, they should know that we will not bow to these difficulties. Despite all the troubles and problems they have created for us, and despite the wounds inflicted upon society, we must heal these wounds.”

The president’s remarks came amid significant American military buildup around Iran that has followed deadly US- and Israeli-backed riots across the country in January that cost the lives of thousands.

Meanwhile referring to the determination and efforts of disabled and differently-abled athletes, he continued:

“You did not surrender in the face of difficulties; likewise, despite all the problems that have been created and the wounds inflicted upon our society, we will not yield to hardships or bullying. We must heal the wounds of our society. We are one nation and one country; we must unite as one and stand firm against adversity. We must set aside differences and problems and place a balm on the wounds of society.”

The President expressed hope that differently-abled athletes would continue to be a source of pride as in the past and said:

“I promise that we will provide the necessary conditions and opportunities for your growth and advancement.”

Addressing the American military posturing on Thursday, Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s envoy to the United Nations, said the Islamic Republic would not initiate war, but would respond firmly to any act of aggression.

“In the event that it (the Islamic Republic) is subjected to military aggression, Iran will respond decisively and proportionately in the exercise of its inherent right of self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations,” the ambassador said in a letter addressed to the UN secretary-general and the president of the Security Council.

Earlier this week, Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei also issued a strong warning against any fresh American military adventurism targeting the Islamic Republic, noting, “The American president [Donald Trump] repeatedly says that their military is the strongest in the world.” “The strongest military in the world, however, can sometimes be struck so hard that it cannot even get back on its feet,” Ayatollah Khamenei stated.

“They keep saying, ‘We have sent an aircraft carrier toward Iran.’ Fine—an aircraft carrier is certainly a dangerous piece of equipment. But more dangerous than the carrier is the weapon capable of sending it to the bottom of the sea,” the Leader noted.

The post Iran Not to Bow to Pressure or Coercion appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) The tournament will serve as the second United World Wrestling Ranking Series event of the season.

The tournament spans five days, with weight classes running from start to finish in one day, unlike the two-day format seen at the World Championships. Men’s freestyle leads things off on Wednesday, followed by the start of women’s freestyle on Thursday, and Greco-Roman getting underway on Friday.

Freestyle Wrestling
74 kg: Younes Emami
79 kg: Mohammad Nokhodi
92 kg: Amirhossein Firouzpour
Greco-Roman Wrestling
63 kg: Ali Hajiavand
72 kg: Mohammadjavad Rezaei – Hojat Rezaei
77 kg: Amir Abdi – Alireza Abdoli
82 kg: Mohammadamin Hosseini
87 kg: Jamal Esmaeili
97 kg: Amirreza Moradian
130 kg: Fardin Hedayati

The post Iran to compete at 2026 Muhamet Malo appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Ameryan emphasized that the establishment of active specialized committees, including those focused on agriculture, transportation, banking, and currency, could allow technical and operational issues to be resolved at the expert level, reducing the need for high-level governmental intervention. “If challenges are addressed efficiently within these committees, there may be no necessity to wait for full commission sessions or changes in government to advance bilateral cooperation,” he stated.

Highlighting the historical significance of trade ties, Ameryan pointed out that during Ambassador Ghorabi’s tenure, trade between Iran and Brazil reached approximately $1.3 billion. Despite regional and international fluctuations, trade has maintained a substantial role, with Brazil proving especially supportive during periods of international sanctions, providing key logistical assistance through ports and maritime transport for Iranian goods.

One of the most promising avenues for bilateral cooperation, Ameryan said, is overseas cultivation. Proposals in Brazil have offered up to one million hectares of land to Iranian investors, with 15–20% of investment capital provided by the Iranian side and the remainder financed through long-term loans spanning 15–20 years with interest rates of 5–6%. High productivity levels, combined with Brazil’s favorable climate and rainfall patterns, allow multiple harvests annually—up to five crops in two years for products such as corn or rice in some regions—making these projects economically viable and attractive for investors.

Despite these opportunities, currency restrictions and Central Bank regulations present significant challenges. Iranian investors face strict limitations when transferring capital abroad or using export revenues for overseas investments. Ameryan stressed that revising these regulations could unlock substantial investment potential and facilitate broader engagement in foreign agricultural projects.

Another persistent issue is the repatriation of export earnings. Exporters, including those of carpets and other goods, are obligated to return foreign currency within three months, a process often delayed by banking and trade procedures. These delays can prevent exporters from accessing foreign exchange allocations on time, limiting their ability to reinvest or expand operations, and further complicating trade with Brazil.

Former Ambassador Hossein Ghorabi highlighted Brazil’s continued importance as a strategic trading partner for Iran. He noted that Brazil currently accounts for approximately 7–8% of Iran’s total foreign trade, equivalent to nearly $8 billion of Iran’s $50 billion total foreign trade. He emphasized that activating specialized committees under the Iran-Brazil Joint Commission, particularly in agriculture, could facilitate tangible progress without waiting for full commission-level sessions.

Ghorabi further highlighted the unique governance structure in Brazil, where agricultural execution is largely managed at the state rather than the federal level. This decentralization necessitates engagement with state authorities and governors, who hold substantial executive powers, for the successful implementation of projects. As a result, interactions solely with the central government are insufficient to advance agricultural initiatives effectively.

In terms of export opportunities, petrochemical products remain a key sector. Currently, Iran exports approximately 1.8 million tons of petrochemicals to Brazil annually, although Brazil has the capacity to absorb nearly three million tons. Despite the growth potential, exports have largely stagnated in recent years. Ghorabi suggested that negotiating preferential or tariff agreements with Brazil could improve Iran’s market share and competitiveness. He cited China’s experience, where trade with Brazil increased from $3 billion to $170 billion over 25 years, as a model for potential expansion.

The meeting also reviewed the structure of the Iran-Brazil Joint Commission, which includes five main working groups: trade, industry and mining, finance and insurance, energy (including water, electricity, oil, gas, and petrochemicals), agriculture, and technology and education. These committees focus on practical objectives, such as improving air and maritime transportation, facilitating barter and oil-to-chemical exchanges, promoting overseas cultivation, and ensuring access to key agricultural inputs. The Planning and Budget Organization stressed the importance of increasing private-sector participation in these efforts, with government institutions taking on a supportive rather than directive role.

Alireza Pirouzan, head of the Americas Department at Iran’s Chamber of Commerce, noted the limitations of relying on international platforms such as BRICS, describing it as an alliance rather than a fully coordinated organization. Recent disagreements between Russia and South Africa, he said, illustrate the instability of expectations in such frameworks, underscoring the need for strong bilateral mechanisms to manage trade and investment efficiently.

Overall, the meeting emphasized that overcoming internal regulatory, banking, and currency barriers is crucial to unlocking the full potential of Iran-Brazil trade. Activating specialized committees and promoting state-level collaboration in Brazil could enable both nations to expand trade volumes, improve investment opportunities, and create a more sustainable framework for long-term economic cooperation.

The post Iran and Brazil Aim to Strengthen Trade Through Specialized Committees appeared first on Iran News Daily.

TEHRAN (Iran News) Hassanzadeh, who was in Mecca to attend the 41st General Assembly of the Islamic Chamber, emphasized the importance of direct trade channels between Iran and Sausdi Arabia. He proposed the reciprocal dispatch and reception of trade delegations and the organization of a dedicated trade exhibition in Saudi Arabia to showcase Iranian commercial capacities. “Currently, Iran and Saudi Arabia do not have direct commercial exchanges,” he said, stressing the need to remove intermediaries and establish a direct trade framework between the two countries.

The Iranian official highlighted the country’s capabilities in food industries, which meet international standards and are exported worldwide, as a potential area for expanding trade with Saudi Arabia. He also suggested using the Port of Dammam, Saudi Arabia, as a primary entry point for Iranian goods, citing its strategic proximity for facilitating commerce.

Hassanzadeh further proposed organizing a dedicated Iranian trade exhibition in Saudi Arabia alongside the visit of a Saudi trade delegation to Iran. He extended an invitation to Sheikh Kamel to visit Iran to gain firsthand familiarity with the country’s economic and industrial capacities.

During the meeting, Hassanzadeh stressed the broader potential of Islamic countries to develop an independent trade route among themselves through the creation of a shared financial exchange center. “Islamic countries have the capacity to establish an independent trade mechanism and strengthen their collective economic resilience,” he said. He urged that such cohesion would allow member countries to respond collectively to external pressures or economic attacks, reducing their vulnerability on the global stage.

Sheikh Saleh Kamel welcomed the proposals, underlining the importance of establishing direct commercial ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia. He assured that the idea would be raised with senior officials in Saudi Arabia for follow-up. Kamel also expressed support for the exchange of trade delegations and the organization of the Iranian trade exhibition in Saudi Arabia, describing these measures as an opportunity to facilitate bilateral negotiations and enhance cooperation between the two countries’ business communities.

The meeting included board members of the Saudi Chambers Federation and emphasized strengthening collaboration across various economic sectors, including industrial production, trade facilitation, and logistics. Both sides agreed on the strategic importance of expanding bilateral trade and fostering closer economic ties between Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the broader Islamic world.

The discussions reflect growing interest in leveraging economic diplomacy to reinforce ties within the Islamic world and to overcome barriers imposed by intermediaries, sanctions, or other global trade restrictions. Establishing direct trade and a dedicated financial exchange platform is seen as a key step toward increasing regional self-reliance and economic integration.

The post Iran Calls for Direct Trade with Saudi Arabia appeared first on Iran News Daily.